BRENDA P. ALBANO, APPELLANT,
v.
UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION AND FORT PIERCE UTILITIES AUTHORITY, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 1997-12-03
No. 96-3354
GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.
701 So. 2d 911 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The referee’s determination that appellant’s illness required her to leave her employment was a finding of fact. The Unemployment Appeals Commission may only reverse those findings “where there is no competent, substantial evidence in the record to support the appeals referee’s decision.” Campeanu v. Florida Unemployment App. Comm’n, 629 So. 2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). We hold that the record contains sufficient competent, substantial evidence to support the referee’s decision and that appellant is entitled to benefits as ordered by the referee. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN, DELL and WARNER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. State, 886 So. 2d 1078 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
    …nd for the trial court to resolve the discrepancy and, if necessary, to correct the record as to the actual oral pronouncement of the conditions that were violated. See Cunningham v. State, 818 So. 2d 685, 686 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Henderson v. State, 701 So. 2d 911, 912 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We reject Williams’ contention that the trial court should be directed to reconsider the revocation because, given the violations shown here, there is no reasonable possibility that the outcome would be different. Cf. Melec…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw