ALBERTO L. APONTE, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1997-12-19
No. 97-2212
GRIFFIN, C.J., and COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
702 So. 2d 309 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1997) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Aiello v. State, 700 So. 2d 148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).

GRIFFIN, C.J., and COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …diligence within the two-year time limit"); Rogers v. State , 932 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 5th DCA. 2006) ( Rule 3.850 motion denied for "untimeliness" where the evidence "could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence"); Scott v. State , 702 So. 2d 309 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) ( Rule 3.850 motion "untimely" where the alleged new evidence "could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence within the two-year time period"). It is true that in each of the foregoing cases, the state courts u…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw