STEPHEN COTTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEPHEN COTTON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
703 So. 2d 1160
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Finding no merit in the appellant’s argument, we affirm the order of restitution. However, based on the appellee’s concession, we remand so the trial court may amend the order to allow for installment payments pursuant to the plea bargain and section 775.089(3)(b) and (6), Florida Statutes (1995).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jett v. State, 722 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…ion before Mr. Jett made restitution, and the State does not contend otherwise. A trial court is without jurisdiction to revoke probation where the “affidavit of violation was filed after the expiration of the probationary term.” Bostwick v. State, 703 So. 2d 1160, 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Since no “appropriate steps” were taken to revoke probation until after appellant had paid restitution in full, it is immaterial whether “the [*216] Defendant was m [so-called] violation status when he made restitution.” Ou…
-
Belt v. State, 748 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)…t of violation is not filed until after the term of probation has expired. See Francois v. State, 695 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 1997); Jett v. State, 722 So. 2d 211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Harris v. State, 720 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1998); Bostwick v. State, 703 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); McGraw v. State, 700 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); Fellman v. State, 673 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). The state contends that Belt’s probation did not expire until July, 1998. This construction of his sentence ignores the l…