WILLIE J. ELLISON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIE J. ELLISON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
703 So. 2d 1248
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. The issue raised by the appellant was considered and rejected in Ellison v. State, 659 So. 2d 1101 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Rule 3.800(a) cannot be used to rear-gue the same ground. See., e.g., Hall v. State, 690 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997).
DAUKSCH, PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ellison v. State, 807 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…enial of defendant Willie James Ellison’s seventh Rule 3.800(a) motion is affirmed.1 Three Rule 3.800(a) motions ago, this court warned Ellison that it was improper to reargue a ground already considered and rejected on the merits. Ellison v. State, 703 So. 2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA [*826] 1998). Yet Ellison has persisted in doing just that. Based upon his numerous and successive meritless pro se filings, we hold that Ellison is precluded from filing any additional pro se appeals, pleadings, motions or petitions…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Hall v. State, 690 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)