MARCUS J. ROTH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1997-04-23
No. 96-2860
Before JORGENSON and SHEVIN, JJ., and BARKDULL, Senior Judge.
704 So. 2d 547 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1997)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing and substitute the following opinion for the opinion filed February 5,1997.

We reverse the order denying defendant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion as to grounds one and two of defendant’s motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing as the record does not conclusively refute defendant’s allegations as to his attorney’s misadvice concerning gain-time eligibility. State v. Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235 (Fla.1996); Booth v. State, 687 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). On remand, the court must conduct a hearing “to determine the merits of ... defendant’s claim that he relied in good faith upon the erroneous advice of his attorney in entering a plea.” Leroux, 689 So. 2d 235.

We affirm the remaining portions of the order. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw