VIDYA BERNADETTE SHAW, APPELLANT,

v.

LEANDER J. SHAW, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Rollins v. Pizzarelli, 761 So. 2d 294 (Fla. 2000)
  …Upon consideration of the respondents’ motion for rehearing, rehearing is granted. The opinion issued in this case on February 4, 1999, is withdrawn, and the following opinion is substituted in its place. We have for review Pizzarelli v. Rollins, 704 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), in which the district court recognized conflict with the opinion in Kokotis v. DeMarco, 679 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), and certified the following question to this Court: WHETHER THE TERM “PAID OR PAYABLE” IN SECTION 627.7…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Pate v. Renfroe, 715 So. 2d 1094 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …duplication of benefits between the jury verdict against Renfroe (for Pate’s past lost wages and past medical expenses) and' any future PIP payment to Pate for future wage losses and medical bills. This case differs from both Pizzarelli v. Rollins, 704 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), review granted, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Issue 25B, p. i (Fla. June 19, 1998), and Kokotis v. DeMarco, 679 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), review denied mem., 689 So. 2d 1068 (Fla.1997). In Pizzarelli the court held that “payable” mean…
• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Klinglesmith, 717 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
  …ture medical expenses) in the amount of “personal injury protection benefits paid or payable” and then construed this language to include “expenses which have not yet accrued but which will result from the covered injury.” In Pizzarelli v. Rollins, 704 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), the Fourth District adopted a more limited definition of what is payable by restricting it to “those medical bills incurred before trial which had not been processed by the PIP carrier at the time the offset was sought.” The Piz…

Authorities Cited

• Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
• Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)