STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ALEXANDER BAEZ, APPELLEE
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
ALEXANDER BAEZ, APPELLEE
704 So. 2d 693
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The State appeals the trial court’s order suppressing statements made by the defendant, Alexander Baez. In its ruling, the trial court relied on State v. Guthrie, 666 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). Subsequently, the supreme court reversed Guthrie, citing its recent decision in Sapp v. State, 690 So. 2d 581 (Fla.1997). See State v. Guthrie, 692 So. 2d 888 (Fla.1997). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress and remand for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
PARKER, C.J., and PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baez v. State, 9 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…He moved to suppress his statements in those cases, and the trial court granted his motion. The State appealed, and this court reversed the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress and remanded for further proceedings. See State v. Baez, 704 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). In June 1998, on remand, Baez entered negotiated pleas to the second set of cases and was sentenced to three seven-year terms to be served concurrently with each other and with the sentences in the first set of cases. Subsequent…
Authorities Cited
- Sapp v. State, 690 So. 2d 581 (Fla. 1997)
- State v. Guthrie, 666 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- State v. Guthrie, 692 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 1997)