RAUL RAMIREZ, A/K/A ANGEL TAMEZ, A/K/A JUAN RODRIGUEZ, A/K/A JOSE ORTIZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RAUL RAMIREZ, A/K/A ANGEL TAMEZ, A/K/A JUAN RODRIGUEZ, A/K/A JOSE ORTIZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
704 So. 2d 693
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
DANAHY, Acting Chief Judge.
The appellant’s claim that his probation was revoked for a violation of a condition of probation that was not imposed upon him is without merit as shown by the transcript of the revocation hearing. However, he is correct in that the written judgment contains an erroneous reference to the condition violated. We affirm the conviction and sentence but remand for correction of the written order to conform to the oral pronouncement by the trial court at the revocation hearing. See Pearce v. State, 677 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The appellant need not be present for this correction as it essentially deals with a scrivener’s error. Affirmed.
FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Baez v. State, 9 So. 3d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)…He moved to suppress his statements in those cases, and the trial court granted his motion. The State appealed, and this court reversed the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress and remanded for further proceedings. See State v. Baez, 704 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). In June 1998, on remand, Baez entered negotiated pleas to the second set of cases and was sentenced to three seven-year terms to be served concurrently with each other and with the sentences in the first set of cases. Subsequent…
Authorities Cited
- Pearce v. State, 677 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)