MARTIN COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
SHERRY M. CARR, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This opinion concurs in part and dissents in part, arguing that the evidence does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the murder was committed in a cold, calculated, and premeditated manner (CCP).
The author of the opinion believes the trial court erred in finding the murder was committed in a cold, calculated, and premeditated manner.
The case involves a murder, and the author of the opinion believes the facts do not support the 'cold, calculated, and premeditated' aggravator, parti…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
Martin County obtained a final judgment in November, 1994, requiring appellee to remove a mobile home from her property. More than one year after the judgment appellee filed a 1.540(b) motion to set aside the judgment. The trial judge granted that motion, set aside the judgment, and the county appeals. Because the motion was filed more than one year after the judgment, the only basis for setting aside the judgment in this case would be fraud upon the court. Appel- lee’s motion did not allege any facts which could constitute fraud upon the court, nor did she present any evidence of fraud upon the court. We therefore reverse the order vacating the final judgment.
STONE, C.J., and KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.