RUSSELL A. FIRESTONE, APPELLANT,
v.
MARY ALICE FIRESTONE, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1998-02-04
No. 97-2107
GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.
704 So. 2d 1146 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that a trial court must make specific findings regarding needs and financial resources when awarding attorney's fees, even if based on willful non-compliance.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellant appealed an amended order adjudicating him in contempt. The trial court awarded appellee attorney's fees without making specific findings re…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Russell A. Firestone, Jr., appeals the Amended Order Adjudicating Former Husband in Contempt entered in this case. We affirm the Amended Order in all respects except that portion of the order awarding appellee attorney’s fees, which we reverse and remand.

In this case the trial court awarded appel-lee attorney’s fees without making specific findings regarding the needs and financial resources of appellee and appellant’s ability to pay. As this court held in St. Pierre v. Greenberg, 697 So. 2d 218, 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997):

In assessing attorney’s fees against a party, a trial court may consider that party’s willful refusal to comply with an existing order if that conduct made further litigation necessary for enforcement. See Patterson v. Patterson, 399 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). In doing so, however, the trial court must still consider the need of the movant and the ability of the recalcitrant party to pay the movant’s fees. See id. at 74-75; see also § 61.16, Fla. Stat. (1995); Warnhoff v. Warnhoff, 493 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN and SHAHOOD, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw