STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ON BEHALF OF ELIZABETH J. KNIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLIE E. SIMMS, A/K/A WILLIE C. COLLINS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Department of Revenue appealed a trial court's decision to set aside a paternity judgment that had been final for over a year. The appellate court held that the paternity determination was res judicata and could not be reopened absent fraud, and reversed the trial court's order allowing genetic testing to challenge the established paternity.
A final paternity judgment is res judicata and cannot be set aside absent fraud on the court. The trial court erred in reopening the paternity determination based on a late request for genetic testing, as the defendant had a full opportunity to contest paternity at the initial hearing and failed to do so or appeal.
[1] A final judgment adjudicating paternity is res judicata and bars relitigation of paternity absent fraud upon the court.
[2] A party who has been adjudicated the legal and natural father and ordered to pay child support cannot later seek an HLA blood test to deny paternity when faced with a con…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“if the father had doubts about his paternity, he should have raised them at the paternity determination hearing. Because that issue had been previously resolved, absent fraud on the court, the paternity adjudication was res judicata.”
Establishes the core holding that paternity determinations become final and cannot be reopened absent fraud
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Department of Revenue filed a complaint on behalf of Elizabeth Knight alleging Willie Simms was the father of her child. Simms was served on Octob…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Hearing Officer'S Recommended Order cases and more on FLexlaw
NORTHCUTT, Judge.
The Department of Revenue has appealed the trial court’s order setting aside a previously-entered final judgment of paternity. We treat the department’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, and grant the petition1.
The department, on behalf of Elizabeth Knight, filed a complaint to determine the paternity of her child and to establish the father’s child support obligation. The complaint alleged that Willie Simms was the child’s father. Simms was personally served with process on October 6, 1994. He failed to file any responsive pleadings, and the clerk entered a default in December 1994.. On March 6,1995, a hearing officer entered a recommended order adjudicating Simms to be the natural and legal father of Knight’s, child. The circuit court entered a final judgment on March 17, 1995, adopting and approving the hearing officer’s findings and recommendations. Simms never appealed this order, nor did he move to set it aside under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.530 or 1.540(b).
In September 1996, Simms finally appeared in court. He requested that he, Knight and the child undergo genetic testing to determine if he was the child’s father. The hearing officer concluded that the previous order determining paternity should be set aside, pending the results of such testing. The circuit court again entered an order approving and adopting this recommendation.
In Miller v. Cowart, 546 So .2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), the father attempted to deny paternity four years after the judgment establishing his paternity had been entered. We held that if the father had doubts about his paternity, he should have raised them at the paternity determination hearing. Because that issue had been previously resolved, absent fraud on the court, the paternity adjudication was res judicata. See also State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Opel, 620 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Chambers, 472 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). The same reasoning applies here. In setting aside the final order determining paternity, the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law.
Certiorari granted and order setting aside paternity determination pending genetic testing quashed.
BLUE, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., concur. . We note that certain "non-final orders entered after final order on authorized motions” are reviewable on appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(4). The interlocutory order in this case, however, was not entered on an authorized motion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. Johnson, 395 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)
- Michelle Miller & the Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Cowart, 546 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs. v. Chambers, 472 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
- State v. Opel, 620 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)