ROBERT FORD AND BOBBIE SUE FORD, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
RYDER AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., D/B/A DELAVAN, AND DELAVAN INDUSTRIES, INC., RYDER SYSTEM, INC., AND RYDER AUTOMOTIVE CARRIER GROUP, INC., APPELLEES
ROBERT FORD AND BOBBIE SUE FORD, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
RYDER AUTOMOTIVE OPERATIONS, INC., D/B/A DELAVAN, AND DELAVAN INDUSTRIES, INC., RYDER SYSTEM, INC., AND RYDER AUTOMOTIVE CARRIER GROUP, INC., APPELLEES
705 So. 2d 138
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek review of an order dismissing their product liability action on forum non conveniens grounds. After a careful review, we are unable to conclude that the order constituted an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
ALLEN, WEBSTER and DAVIS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ned Guilford v. State, 715 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…enough. The defendant is prohibited from filing any further pro se pleadings with this court concerning his convictions and sentences in Case No. 91-6837-CFA. As this court did in Hendrix v. State, 712 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 705 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Rooney v. State, 699 So. 2d 1027 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) and O’Brien v. State, 689 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 697 So. 2d 511 (Fla.1997), the defendant is warned of the consequences of persisting. AFFIRMED. ' COBB, G…