LESLIE QUIGG, CHIEF OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
E. H. RADEL, JR., DEFENDANT IN ERROR
Per Curiam.
In this case the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Ellis and Mr. Justice Browne are of opinion that the final order herein, discharging the petitioner in habeas corpus proceedings, should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Whitfield, Mr. Justice West and Mr. Justice Terrell are of opinion that the final order' should be reversed; and there being no prospect of a change of judicial opinion, the judgment should be affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South Rep. 51, and Pensacola Electric Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389, 54 South. Rep. 452.
An order will be entered affirming the final order to which the writ of error herein was taken.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Henderson v. State, 94 Fla. 318 (Fla. 1927)…, 87 So. 60; Gee v. State, 61 Fla. 22, 54 So. 458; Cooley v. State, 85 Fla. 46, 95 So. 126; Joyner v. State, 85 Fla. 384, 96 So. 155; Shuler v. State, 84 Fla. 414, 93 So. 672; Crawford v. State, 86 Fla. 94, 97 So. 288; Jacques v. State, 86 Fla. 137, 97 So. 380; White v. State, 84 Fla. 677, 95 So. 113; Holmberg v. Hardee, 90 Fla. 787, 108 So. 213; Stephens v. State, (Fla.) 109 So. 303; Herd v. Maloney, (Fla.) 110 So. 349; O’Steen v. State, (Fla.) 111 So. 725; Pearce v. State, (Fla.) 112 So. 83. It would u…
-
Samuels v. State, 123 Fla. 280 (Fla. 1936)…ion in the criminal case to seek delay.” See Bolles v. Carson, 73 Fla. 504, 74 So. 509; Clements v. State, 51 Fla. 6, 40 So. 432; Pittman v. State, 51 Fla. 94, 41 So. 385; Ballard v. State, 31 Fla. 266, 12 So. 865, and Jacques v. State, 86 Fla. 137, 97 So. 380. In Early v. State, 51 Tex. Crim. 382, 103 S. W. 868, page 370, the court said: “If it be conceded that the testimony of said witness would contradict the testimony of the State’s witness, Harriss, a new trial will not ordinarily be granted on acc…
-
Brown v. State, 135 Fla. 90 (Fla. 1938)…clearly shown that there has been a palpable abuse of such discretion to the injury of the party against whom it was exercised. See Ward v. State, 83 Fla. 311, 91 So. 189; Yarborough v. State, 94 Fla. 143, 114 So. 237; Jacques v. State, 86 Fla. 137, 97 So. 380; Hall v. State, 70 Fla. 48, 69 So. 692; Maddox v. State, 69 Fla. 695; 69 So. 20; Webster v. State, 47 Fla. 108, 36 So. 584; Denham v. State, 22 Fla. 664; Clinton v. State, 53 Fla. 98, 43 So. 312, 12 Ann. Cas. 150; Jerry v. State, 99 Fla. 1330, 128 S…
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The State of Fla. ex rel. Hiram J. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224 (Fla. 1904)
- Pensacola Elec. Co. v. Humphreys, 61 Fla. 389 (Fla. 1911)