JOHNNY LEE REMBERT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dinardo v. State, 742 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …a Statutes (1997), including evidence that the appellant’s multidisciplinary treatment team deemed the authorized treatment necessary, we affirm. In affirming, we distinguish Meeker v. State, 584 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), and Vaughn v. State, 705 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).1 In both Meeker and Vaughn, we reversed orders authorizing involuntary treatment under chapter 916 because the record in each case failed to contain evidence substantiating compliance with the statutory requirement that the trea…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Ludwige Louisma v. State, 78 So. 3d 50 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …elled pursuant to the statute, supra, is treatment “deemed necessary by the treatment team. ” We are unable to find in the record here any compliance in form or substance with that requirement. Id. at 170 (emphasis added). See also Vaughn v. State, 705 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (holding that treatment order’s conclusory findings failed to comport with the requirements delineated in Meeker where the lower court made no reference to the multidisciplinary treatment team in the order or whether the team had…
• Moreland v. State, 706 So. 2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …orida Statutes (Supp.1996), we conclude that the order is inadequate for failure to satisfy the minimum statutory requirements delineated in Meeker v. State, 584 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Accordingly, we reverse the order. See Vaughn v. State, 705 So. 2d 951 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The appellant was a “forensic patient” committed to Florida State Hospital pursuant to chapter 916, Florida Statutes, after being found incompetent to proceed to trial. Although the appellant was discharged from the Florida St…