DR. ROBERT G. MONSOUR, APPELLANT,
v.
BRUCE BALK, A.I.A., P.A., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Dr. Monsour appeals the denial of his motion for relief from a default judgment in a breach of contract case, arguing the judgment is void due to insufficient service of process. The court agrees and reverses, holding that the trial court failed to conduct the required evidentiary hearing to determine whether valid service was obtained.
The court held that the default judgment is void due to insufficient service of process and that the trial court erred by not conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the facts alleged in the affidavits could be proven. The judgment must be set aside because no valid basis for service existed under Florida law.
[1] A trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing when a defendant's affidavit alleges facts that, if proven, would establish that the person served was not qualified to…
[2] Service of process by delivery to a person at their regular abode with any person residing therein who is fifteen years or older is only valid if the defendant's regular…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the trial court erred by not conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether or not the facts in the affidavits could be proven”
Establishes the procedural error: when service is challenged by affidavit, the trial court must hold a hearing rather than enter default judgment
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBruce Balk sued three doctors and a hotel for breach of contract regarding architectural services. Unable to serve the other defendants, Balk attempte…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substituted Service cases and more on FLexlaw
PARKER, Chief Judge.
Dr. Monsour seeks review of the final order denying his motion for relief from judgment in this contract case. Dr. Monsour argues that the default judgment that was entered against him is void because of insufficient process of service. We agree and reverse because the trial court failed to determine whether it had jurisdiction to enter a default judgment due to insufficient service of process.
Bruce Balk, A.I.A., P.A. (Balk) filed a complaint against three doctors and a hotel for breach of contract for failure to pay Balk for architectural services. Balk was unable to obtain service on the other defendants and attempted to obtain service on Dr. Monsour by serving his son, who lives in Sarasota.
Dr. Monsour lives in Pennsylvania where he practices medicine. The son alleges in his affidavit that the sheriff served the complaint on him at his personal residence. When the son realized the mistake the sheriff had made, he informed Balk that he did not represent any of the people involved in this contract and that Balk needed to serve his father in Pennsylvania. Balk allegedly told the son that he would have Dr. Monsour served in Pennsylvania. Instead, Balk filed a motion for default.
First, the trial court erred by not conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether or not the facts in the affidavits could be proven. See Fern, Ltd. v. Road Legends, Inc., 698 So. 2d 364, 365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (Court required to hold evidentiary hearing in face of allegations in affidavit of defendant, because if proven would establish that person served was not qualified to accept service for defendant).
If the allegations in Dr. Monsour’s and his son’s affidavits are true; Balk did not obtain service on Dr. Monsour. Balk argues that he obtained substituted service by serving Dr. Monsour’s son. Section 48.031(1)(a), Florida Statutes (1995), provides for service of process by delivery to the person at their regular abode with any person residing therein who is fifteen years or older. This does not apply because Dr. Monsour’s regular place of abode is in Pennsylvania. Furthermore, Balk did not obtain service by service on an agent of a nonresident doing business in this state. Section 48.071, Florida Statutes (1995), sets forth the procedure for serving someone who does business in Florida, but has his principal place of business or residence in another state. Balk failed to follow any of these procedures. Accordingly, if the allegations are true, then the judgment would be void because the original service was so defective that it amounted to no notice of the proceedings. This requires the trial court to set aside the judgment. See Myrick v. Walters, 666 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Furthermore, this can be done by motion at any time. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540; Saharuni v. Saharuni 343 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).
Finally, we note that Dr. Monsour correctly argues that when a contract requires arbitration of all claims between the parties, this provision is not waived by the filing of a motion to set aside a judgment or a motion to dismiss. See Duckworth v. Plant, 697 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). As stated in Oakdale Park Ltd. v. Byrd, 346 So. 2d 648, 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), a party to a contract may not “flagrantly disregard” the arbitration provision and file suit. Accordingly, Dr. Monsour did not waive this provision by filing a motion for relief from judgment.
We, therefore, reverse the final order denying Dr. Monsour’s motion for relief from final judgment and remand in order for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing.
PATTERSON and FULMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Eyal Avi-Isaac v. Wells Fargo Bank, 59 So. 3d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…in Sperdute determined that “by denying the Sperdutes’ request to testify at the evidentiary hearing on their motion to vacate the default final judgment, the trial court effectively denied them an opportunity to be heard.” Id. In Monsour v. Balk, 705 So. 2d 968, 969 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), this court addressed the failure to hold an evidentiary hearing on a motion for relief from judgment. This court determined that the trial court erred by not holding an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the movant cou…
-
Southeastern Termite AND Pest v. Aser Ones and Gladys Ones, 792 So. 2d 1266 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…la. 4th DCA 1996) (finding that affidavits supporting defendant’s motion to vacate default judgment, if true, created an issue of fact as to receipt of notice, therefore, the trial court was required to hold an evidentiary hearing); Monsour v. Balk, 705 So. 2d 968, 970 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (stating that the affidavit supporting defendant’s motion for relief from judgment, if true, would establish that defendant’s son was not qualified to accept service for defendant and therefore the trial court was required to…
-
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Huso Dzidzovic, 249 So. 3d 1265 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)…ng a prior order of dismissal based upon ex parte communications with only one of the parties improperly excluded the other party from addressing whether the order should be vacated as the product of mistake under rule 1.540(b)); Monsour v. Balk, 705 So. 2d 968, 969 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding that trial court erred in denying motion for relief from judgment without "conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether or not the facts in the affidavits could be proven"); Schuman v. Int'l Consumer Cor…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Myrick v. Walters, 666 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- Fern, Ltd. v. Rd. Legends, Inc., 698 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Saharuni v. Seda Nercession Saharuni, 343 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)
- Darling Siplin v. State, 346 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Oakdale Park, Ltd. v. Byrd, 346 So. 2d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Brake v. Brake, 697 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- Corinne Duckworth v. Plant, 697 So. 2d 1257 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)