CLAUD N. CHAPPELL AND AFFORDABLE AIR SYSTEMS, INC., N/K/A ABSOLUTELY COOL, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
AFFORDABLE AIR, INC. APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A default judgment for failure to comply with discovery requires an explicit finding of willful noncompliance.
Appellants failed to comply with discovery rules and court orders, leading to a default judgment against them. The trial court did not make an explici…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Court Orders cases and more on FLexlaw
WHATLEY, Judge.
Claud N. Chappell and Affordable Air Systems, Inc., appeal a default judgment on liability entered against them and in favor of Affordable Air, Inc. The default judgment was entered against the appellants for their failure to comply with discovery rules and court orders. We reverse.
In Commonwealth Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So. 2d 1271 (Fla.1990), the Florida Supreme Court held that an order of dismissal or default for failure to comply with a discovery requirement must contain an explicit finding of willful noneom-pliance. See also Drakeford v. Barnett Bank of Tampa, 694 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997); Smith v. Spitale, 675 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Global Recreation, Ltd. v. Arco Shows, Inc., 585 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Here, the default judgment contains no explicit finding of willful noncompliance. As in Tubero, the facts in this case might support a finding of willful noncompliance; however, absent a specific finding of such, reversal is required.
We vacate the final judgment and remand the case for the entry of an amended order containing the findings required by Tubero, if the record supports such a finding. Otherwise, the trial court should reinstate the pleadings.
Judgment vacated and cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Moshe Tubero, 569 So. 2d 1271 (Fla. 1990)
- Walter H.C. Drakeford v. Barnett Bank OF Tampa, 694 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)
- Smith v. Spitale, 675 So. 2d 207 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996)
- Global Rec., Ltd. v. Arco Shows, Inc., 585 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)