ANDRE C. JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1998-02-27
No. 97-1718
DAUKSCH, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
706 So. 2d 126 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*127] PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Neal v. State, 688 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Newnum v. Weber, 715 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
    …arning ability” to pay “[b]ased on his history and prospects.” A trial court, however, abuses its discretion in basing an award of attorney’s fees and costs on future financial prospects rather than on a current ability to pay. See Mathis v. Mathis, 706 So. 2d 126 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (an attorney’s fees award in a modification proceeding should be based on the relative financial positions of the parties at the time the order of modification is entered). We further observe that the former wife is not deservin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw