LYLE JENKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1998-02-27
No. 97-0756
GRIFFIN, C.J., and GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
706 So. 2d 128 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Briggs v. State, 682 So. 2d 1151, 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996), rev. denied, 691 So. 2d 1079 (Fla.1997).

GRIFFIN, C.J., and GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mikolsky v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 721 So. 2d 738 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)
    …he statute. The result is delay and expense for working people who can little afford either and who may ultimately lose because they lack sufficient knowledge and ability to successfully pursue an appeal. See Hall v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 706 So. 2d 128 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). REVERSED. DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur. ON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION AS QUESTION OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE W. SHARP, Judge. Appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission moves this court for certification of a question decide…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw