LOUIS EDWARD KELLY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Louis Kelly appeals the addition of four legal status violation points on his sentencing scoresheet, arguing the points are redundant with community sanction violation points assessed under a different rule provision. The Florida appellate court affirms, holding that the plain language of the sentencing rules requires assessment of points under both provisions.
The trial judge correctly assessed four legal status violation points under subsection (d)(16), and the plain language of the sentencing rules requires the imposition of points under both subsections (d)(16) and (d)(17).
[1] Legal status violation points are assessed when an offender under court-imposed or post-prison release community supervision commits an offense that results in a convicti…
[2] Points for a legal status violation are assessed only once, regardless of the existence of more than one form of legal status at the time an offense is committed or the n…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Points for a legal status violation are to be assessed only once regardless of the existence of more than one form of legal status at the time an offense is committed or the number of offenses committed while under any form of legal status.”
Establishes that legal status violation points are assessed once but does not prohibit assessment under multiple rule provisions
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceKelly pleaded nolo contendere to grand theft in one case and grand theft auto plus driving with suspended license in another case, both committed in B…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Community Sanction Violation Points cases and more on FLexlaw
LAWRENCE, Judge.
Louis E. Kelly (Kelly) appeals the addition of four legal status points on his sentencing scoresheet, arguing that the addition is redundant and illogical in his case. We affirm.
Kelly, in case 96-1916, pleaded nolo con-tendere to grand theft committed on August 4, 1996, in Bay County. Kelly, in case 96-2204, pleaded nolo contendere to grand theft auto, and driving with a suspended or revoked license committed on September 9, 1996, in Bay County; Kelly also pleaded to violation of the probation imposed in case 96-1916. The trial judge then sentenced Kelly to one year of community control, followed by four years of probation, to run concurrently in both cases. Kelly subsequently violated legal status in both case 96-1916 and case 96-2204 by failing to report to his probation officer, and by being charged with disorderly conduct.
The trial judge, sentencing Kelly in case 96-2204, included cases 96-1916 and 96-2204 on one guidelines scoresheet, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d). .The judge, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.703(d)(16), assessed four legal status violation points, and assessed the four points only once. Kelly argues that four points should not have been assessed under subsection (d)(16) of rule 3.703 because points were assessed under subsection (d)(17) of the rule — he says this is redundant.
Rule 3.703 in relevant part provides:
(16) “Legal status points” are assessed when an offender: (G) Is under any form of court-imposed or post-prison release community supervision and commits an offense that results in conviction. Legal status violationsC receive a score of Jp sentence points and are scored when the offense committed while under legal status is before the court for sentencing. Points for a legal status violation are to be assessed only once regardless of the existence of more than one form of legal status at the time an offense is committed or the number -of offenses committed while under any form of legal status.
(17) Community sanction violation points occur when the offender is found to have violated a condition of:
(A) Probation;
(B) Community Control; or
(C) Pretrial Intervention or diversion.
Community sanction violation points are assessed when a community sanction violation is before the court for sentencing. Six community sanction violation points shall be assessed for each violation or if the violation results from a new felony conviction, 12 community sanction violation points shall be assessed....
(Emphasis added.) The plain language of the rule thus requires the imposition of points under both subsections.2
The trial judge correctly assessed four legal status violation points when sentencing Kelly. We therefore affirm Kelly’s judgment and sentence.
KAHN and MICKLE, JJ., concur. . Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(6) in relevant part provides:
“Legal status at time of offense” is defined as follows: Offenders on parole, probation, or community control; offenders in custody serving a sentence; escapees; fugitives who have fled to avoid prosecution or who have failed to appear for a criminal judicial proceeding or who have violated conditions of a supersedeas bond; and offenders in pretrial intervention or diversion programs. Legal status points are to be assessed where these forms of legal constraint existed at the time of the commission of offenses scored as primary or additional offenses at conviction. Legal status points are to be assessed only once whether there are one or more offenses at conviction.
'(Emphasis added.)
. We note that the standard scoresheet provides for the addition of points for both “Legal Status Violation = 4 Points," see Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.991(a)(V), and for “Community Sanction Violation before the court for sentencing.” See id. at (VI) ("6 Pts x each such successive violation OR New Felony Conviction =12 Pts X each such successive violation”).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jones v. State, 901 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…required by the Fortner-Anderson-Cruz line of cases. Turning to the second motion to correct sentencing error, addressing the four points for a legal status violation, Jones relies on Rule 3.703(16)(G), now Rule 3.704(d)(15)(G), and Kelly v. State, 706 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), to support his contention that the points were improperly included on his sentencing scoresheet because the theft charge was not itself before the trial court for sentencing during the probation proceeding. Rule 3.704(d)(15)(G)…
-
Holmes v. State, 109 So. 3d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)…minal Punishment Code scoresheet, a defendant may be assessed six points for each “community sanction violation,” which points are assessed for each violation of probation. See Jones v. State, 901 So. 2d 255, 258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Kelly v. State, 706 So. 2d 396, 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.704(d)(16) (providing that com [*1192] munity sanction points are assessed when a community sanction violation is before the court for sentencing). Here, the record shows that Holmes was before t…
-
Lockhart v. State, 980 So. 2d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…d at the time of sentencing if, at the time of the commission of the offense(s) for which he is being sentenced, the defendant was under any form of legal status. § 921.0024(l)(b), Fla. Stat. (2006); Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(15); see Kelly v. State, 706 So. 2d 396 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). “Community sanction violation points are assessed when a community sanction violation is before the court for sentencing.” § 921.0024(l)(b); accord Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.704(d)(16); see Kelly, 706 So. 2d at 397. When the trial cour…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence