RAYMOND ADAMS, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1998-03-25
No. 97-2522
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
706 So. 2d 1380 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Topics

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Replevin cases and more on FLexlaw


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order striking Raymond Adams, Sr.’s complaint for replevin seeking the return of his property. The state properly concedes that Adams is entitled to the requested relief. On October 26, 1993, the trial court had previously granted Adams’ motion for return of property. The trial court has authority to provide for recovery of property after termination of a criminal case, Sawyer v. Gable, 400 So. 2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), and the court had jurisdiction to entertain Adams’ request. We therefore reverse the order and remand the cause for further proceedings to facilitate the return of Adams’ property. Adams is instructed to submit to the trial court such proposed orders as may be necessary to effectuate the court’s order granting the return of the property.

Reversed and remanded.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Rubalcaba v. State, 729 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
    …gal maximum. The trial court restructured concurrent sentences to consecutive sentences to achieve the original sentencing intent. This court affirmed on appeal, rejecting defendant’s argument that restructuring was improper. See Rubalcaba v. State, 706 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). In his 1998 motion to correct illegal sentence, defendant again contends that the trial court had no authority to restructure his sentences so as to accomplish the original sentencing intent. That issue was decided against defe…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw