RICHARD JERMAINE DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Revocation Of Community Control cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order revoking appellant’s community control sentence where it was undisputed that appellant was away from his residence on several enumerated dates without permission, contrary to the terms of the community control order. See Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183, 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). Whether the appellant’s absence from his residence at the prescribed times was excusable was a matter for the discretion of the trial court. Id. We do, however, reverse that portion of the written order under review which found that appellant had impermissibly been away from his residence on June 9, 1997, insofar as it is inconsistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement that appellant was not in violation on that date. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for the court’s correction of its written order in this regard.
Affirmed and remanded in part with instructions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. State, 711 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…ntencing. Based on the undisputed evidence that appellant was away from his residence without permission, contrary to the terms of his community control, we find this is a sufficient basis for the revocation of community control. See Davis v. State, 706 So. 2d 1381, 1381 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Smith v. State, 705 So. 2d 1033, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183, 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). As to the remaining issue of appellant’s sentencing, we find no merit. Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)