H.T. CHITTUM BAYSIDE, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
BAYSIDE CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND THE ROUSE COMPANY, A MARYLAND CORPORATION, D/B/A ROUSEMIAMI, INC., APPELLEES
H.T. CHITTUM BAYSIDE, INC., APPELLANT,
BAYSIDE CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A MARYLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, AND THE ROUSE COMPANY, A MARYLAND CORPORATION, D/B/A ROUSEMIAMI, INC., APPELLEES
706 So. 2d 1381
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See The Gap, Inc. v. Brazilian Beat Tour, Inc., 689 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thompson v. State, 711 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…ntencing. Based on the undisputed evidence that appellant was away from his residence without permission, contrary to the terms of his community control, we find this is a sufficient basis for the revocation of community control. See Davis v. State, 706 So. 2d 1381, 1381 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Smith v. State, 705 So. 2d 1033, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Porras v. State, 651 So. 2d 183, 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). As to the remaining issue of appellant’s sentencing, we find no merit. Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- THE GAP, Inc. v. Brazilian Beat Tour, Inc., 689 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)