WILLIE E. CLARK, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIE E. CLARK, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
707 So. 2d 342
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1997)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant challenges his resentencing following this court’s mandate. Of the fourteen issues raised, only issue thirteen, regarding credit for time served, has merit. The state concedes that the 723 days’ credit appellant received cannot be accurate since the record indicates that appellant spent 792 days in the Pinellas County Jail.
We therefore affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, but remand once again to the trial court for a determination of the correct amount of credit to be awarded.
PARKER, C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
S.S. & M.G. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 784 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…ns of a termination of parental rights petition. See, e.g., B.M. v. Dep’t. of Children and Families, 711 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). Although the juvenile rules do not provide for a Richardson hearing, J.L. v. Dep’t of Children and Family Servs., 707 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), the third district in B.M. stated that “failure to adhere to a procedural rule is not reversible error unless violation of the rule resulted in prejudice to the party,” citing Richardson v. State, 246 So. 2d 771, 773 (Fla.1971).…
-
Clark v. State, 858 So. 2d 1122 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…July 13,1993 and February 3,1995.1 Mr. Clark has filed more than one post-conviction motion challenging the precise calculation of his jail credit and also attempting to explain that he is receiving no prison credit for the gap. See Clark v. State, 707 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). The jail credit issue has now been resolved, but Mr. Clark’s valid concern about the gap has either been overlooked or misunderstood. The motion before us was filed pursuant to rule 3.800(a) seeking resolution of a purely legal…