C.O., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Predisposition Report cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction for loitering and prowling. See State v. Ecker, 311 So. 2d 104, 110 (Fla.1975); In re A.R., 460 So. 2d 1024, 1024-25 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
However, the trial court’s adjudication of appellant’s delinquency was rendered without consideration of a predisposition report. See State v. Berry, 647 So. 2d 830, 832 (Fla.1994); Harris v. State, 633 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).
Moreover, there is an absence of specific findings. § 39.052(4)(e)l, Fla.Stat. (1995); J.M. v. State, 692 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); M.C. v. State, 687 So. 2d 832, 833 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Accordingly, we reverse the adjudication and remand.
GLICKSTEIN, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Ecker, 311 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1975)
- In the Interest of A.R., 460 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
- State v. Fletcher Berry, 647 So. 2d 830 (Fla. 1994)
- J.M. v. State, 692 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Harris v. State, 633 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)
- Rogers v. State, 687 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
- M.C. v. State, 687 So. 2d 832 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)