TAMMY RAE FURMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES W. FURMAN, JR., APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1998-03-25
No. 97-01523
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.
707 So. 2d 1183 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases


Opinion of the Court
DOYEL, ROBERT L., Associate Judge.

DOYEL, ROBERT L., Associate Judge.

The appellant wife raises a number of issues in this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Only two merit discussion, and the appellee husband concedes error in both instances. The trial court awarded sole parental responsibility of the couple’s child to the husband, and the record does not support such an award. Furthermore, counsel for the husband pointed out that the husband did not ask for an award of sole parental responsibility. Similarly, although the trial court found that there was no basis for finding that the wife owed any arrearage in child support, the court inexplicably ordered the wife to pay $10 per week against her arrearage.

The final judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part and remanded to the trial court with instructions to strike from the final judgment the $10 weekly child support arrearage payment and to enter an order awarding the parties shared parental responsibility. In all other respects the final judgment is affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Mohamed S. Rashid v. Shanta Rashid, 35 So. 3d 992 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
    …rial court did not make the necessary finding in the final judgment. We note, parenthetically, that Wife requested primary residential parental responsibility, not sole parental responsibility, and that she concedes this error. See Furman v. Furman, 707 So. 2d 1183, 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Accordingly, reversal of this part of the judgment is proper with remand to the trial court to revisit Wife’s request for shared parental responsibility and to make appropriate findings. Schram; Stelk The second issue aris…
  • Cable J. Ridenour, III v. State, 768 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
    …to call witnesses. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new trial. In 1997, Mr. Ridenour was convicted of four counts of aggravated battery and sentenced to fifteen years in prison. On direct appeal, this court affirmed. See Ridenour v. State, 707 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Subsequently, Mr. Ridenour filed a timely motion for postconviction relief. The trial court summarily denied several claims. The remaining claims were denied after an evidentiary hearing. Dispositive of our holding today, we addr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw