HUGH THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals an order denying his motion for correction of sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse the order because, although referring to the record of the proceedings, the trial court failed to attach the pertinent information upon which it relied to deny the motion and without such attachments, we are precluded from conducting meaningful review. See Corp v. State, 698 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand either for attachment of those portions of the record that conclusively show that appellant is not entitled to relief, or for further proceedings.
REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
MICKLE and DAVIS, JJ., and McDonald, PARKER L., Senior Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
LEE v. State, 67 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)…t and others have affirmed the revocation of probation and remanded for entry of a corrected revocation order. See, e.g., Simmons v. State, 913 So. 2d 19, 24 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Burse v. State, 724 So. 2d 596, 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Olvey v. State, 707 So. 2d 1189, 1189-90 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Bourne v. State, 869 So. 2d 606, 607 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). Only when this court cannot determine from the record whether the trial court would have revoked the defendant’s probation based solely on the proper grounds will…
-
Searn Jerome Simmons v. State, 913 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)…uiring that Simmons live without violating the law. See Morse v. State, 604 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Thus, the question is whether the trial court would have revoked Simmons’ probation absent the violation of condition 5. See Olvey v. State, 707 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). In ruling that Simmons had violated his probation, the trial court stated that there was sufficient evidence under the applicable burden of proof that Simmons had violated all three conditions of probation. Although the trial cou…
-
Wright v. State, 941 So. 2d 538 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…ly valid claim for relief. Nothing in the record on appeal suggests that this court has decided the issue of whether the appellant should have been given the option of affirmatively electing sentencing under the 1984 guidelines. See Thomas v. State, 707 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The appellant’s first direct appeal occurred in 1985, four years before Smith was decided. Wright, 487 So. 2d at 1176. In that case, this court affirmed the appellant’s sentence finding that the 1984 guidelines were procedural…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Melville Joseph Corp v. State, 698 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)