EMANUEL O'NEAL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Emanuel O'Neal was convicted of cocaine possession and sentenced to 20 years in prison, but the trial court improperly enhanced a guidelines-recommended sentence that already exceeded the statutory maximum of 5 years. The Fourth District reversed and remanded for resentencing to the guidelines-recommended sentence.
A trial court may not enhance a recommended sentence that already exceeds the statutory maximum by further extending it within the guidelines range. The sentence must be reversed and remanded for resentencing to the guidelines-recommended sentence.
[1] A court may not enhance a recommended sentence that already exceeds the statutory maximum penalty for an offense by further extension within the guidelines range.
[2] An illegal sentence, defined as one exceeding the maximum period set forth by law for a particular offense, may be raised at any time.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the court may not enhance a recommended sentence that already exceeds the maximum set by the penalty statute by a further extension within the guidelines range”
Establishes the core holding that sentencing courts lack authority to increase sentences that already violate statutory maximums through guideline enhancements
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceO'Neal was convicted by jury of possession of cocaine, a third-degree felony with a statutory maximum sentence of 5 years. The sentencing scoresheet r…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Illegal Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
FARMER, Judge.
A jury convicted defendant of possession of cocaine, a third degree felony.1 The penalty statute provides a maximum sentence for this conviction of 5 years.2 His sentencing score-sheet, however, showed a recommended sentence of 220.4 months. The trial judge enhanced the recommended sentence within the guidelines range of 25% and sentenced him to 20 years in prison. This appeal follows.
We decided the issue raised in this appeal in our previous decision in Myers v. State, 696 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, 703 So. 2d 477 (Fla.1997).3 There we held that the court may not enhance a recommended sentence that already exceeds the maximum set by the penalty statute by a further extension within the guidelines range. Myers requires that we reverse the sentence in this case and remand with instructions to resentence defendant to the sentence recommended by the guidelines scoresheet. As we did in Myers, we certify conflict with Mays v. State, 693 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. granted, 700 So. 2d 686 (Fla.1997); Martinez v. State, 692 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. dismissed, 697 So. 2d 1217 (Fla.1997); and Green v. State, 691 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. granted 699 So. 2d 1373 (Fla.1997); and with subsequently issued decision in Floyd v. State, 707 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING TO RECOMMENDED SENTENCE UNDER GUIDELINES.
DELL and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur. . We find no merit in any issue relating to the conviction and consequently affirm it.
. § 775.082(3)(d). Fla. Stat. (1995).
. Defendant did not raise this issue in the trial court, and thus the state argues that he is barred from doing so here by the Criminal Appeal Reform Act of 1996. § 924.051(3), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996) (“A judgment or sentence may be reversed on appeal only when an appellate court determines after a review of the complete record that prejudicial error occurred and ... if not properly preserved, would constitute fundamental error.”). We disagree. If defendant is correct then his sentence is an illegal sentence within the meaning of Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193, 1196 (Fla.1995) ("an illegal sentence is one that exceeds the maximum period set forth by law for a particular offense without regard to the guidelines.”), which may be raised at any time.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Payne v. State, 720 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)…e guidelines scoresheet recommended sentence. This issue was addressed and resolved in favor of appellant’s position by this court in Myers v. State, 696 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. granted, 703 So. 2d 477 (Fla.1997); see also O’Neal v. State, 707 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Thompson v. State, 707 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Hindenach v. State, 708 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Solomon v. State, 23 Fla.L.Weekly D864, 720 So. 2d 1084 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). In Myers, we held that a defendant’s se…
-
State v. O'Neal, 724 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 1999)…SHAW, J. We have for review O’Neal v. State, 707 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), wherein the district court certified conflict with Mays v. [*1188] State, 693 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have since approved the district court decision in Mays. See M…
Authorities Cited
- Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 1995)
- Martinez v. State, 692 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- Myers v. State, 696 So. 2d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
- Mays v. State, 693 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)
- Floyd v. State, 707 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Deno S. Green v. State, 691 So. 2d 502 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)