SCARLETT RIVERA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1998-04-08
Nos. 97-2384, 97-2329
Before JORGENSON, GODERICH and SHEVIN, JJ.
708 So. 2d 1029 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Department of Transp. v. Konney, 587 So. 2d 1292 (Fla.1991).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …present here and accordingly, we affirm. However, we remand for correction of the identified typographical error as it is a scrivener’s error and the error was preserved below and has now been presented on appeal. See generally Helton v. Gunderson, 708 So. 2d 1029, 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (remanding “for correction of a scrivener’s error because the order should have dismissed Counts II-XVII”). AFFIRMED and REMANDED. NARDELLA, WHITE and MIZE, JJ., concur. Christopher V. Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellate Law…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw