ALFREDO SERRANO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALFREDO SERRANO, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
708 So. 2d 1031
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The appellant asserts five grounds in support of his argument that his request for postconviction relief should have been granted. We find no merit in any issue raised by the appellant and affirm the trial court’s denial of postconviction relief. However, we find that the State is correct that there is a scrivener’s error in the appellant’s judgment; there is no indication of the basis for the adjudication of guilt. The judgment should show that the appellant was tried and found guilty by a jury. We herewith amend the judgment to correct this error. In all other respects, we affirm.
PARKER, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and LENDERMAN, JOHN C., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stuart v. State, 869 So. 2d 1238 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…he transcript of this sentencing proceeding clearly reflects the court’s oral pronouncement of a sentence of 21.9375 years. The court may correct this scrivener’s error on remand. See Boggs v. Wainwright, 223 So. 2d 316 (Fla.1969); Serrano v. State, 708 So. 2d 1031 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). We affirm the trial court’s order dismissing Stuart’s motion to withdraw his pleas for lack of jurisdiction. The order properly noted it was without prejudice to Stuart’s right to file a new motion once his appeals were resolved…