BEVERLY J. SCHEEL, APPELLANT,
v.
DETWEILERS PROPANE GAS SERVICE OF SARASOTA, INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
BEVERLY J. SCHEEL, APPELLANT,
DETWEILERS PROPANE GAS SERVICE OF SARASOTA, INC., AND FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, APPELLEES
708 So. 2d 1042
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal arises from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission reversing the appeals referee’s finding that Appellant was discharged and entitled to unemployment benefits. Based on an examination of the record and the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s confession of error, we find that the record contains competent, substantial evidence to support the decision of the appeals referee.
Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BOOTH, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)…a. 1st DCA 1998), review granted, 729 So. 2d 394 (Fla.1999) (Case No. 94,256) Habitual Offender Sentence McLean v. State, 732 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review granted, 744 So. 2d 455 (Fla.1999) (Case No. 95,949) Costs Error Mike v. State, 708 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA), review granted, 719 So. 2d 893 (Fla.1998) (Case No. 93,163) Costs Error Parks v. State, 719 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), review granted, 727 So. 2d 909 (Fla.1999) (Case No. 94,286) Sentence Exceeding Statutory Maximum Perry v…1 / 2
-
State v. Ezekias Mike, 760 So. 2d 145 (Fla. 2000)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Mike v. State, 708 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), wherein the First District certified the following question to be one of great public importance: WHETHER THE WRONGFUL IMPOSITION OF A PUBLIC DEFENDER’S LIEN CONSTITUTES FUNDAMENTAL ERROR WHICH MAY BE CHALLENGED ON DIRECT APPE…
-
Ezekias Mike v. State, 770 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…low,” we are confident that the Supreme Court intended only to quash that portion of our decision that reversed the imposition of a public defender’s lien. In our previous opinion, we affirmed all other issues raised by appellant. See Mike v. State, 708 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We now affirm the conviction in all regards. AFFIRMED. MINER, KAHN, and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.…