LOUIS REED, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Mancino, 714 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 1998)
  …all of the time spent in the county jail before sentencing”). Until July 1995, this remained the state of the law on postconviction claims for additional presen-tencing jail or prison credit raised in 3.800(a) motions. [*431] Vanderblomen v. State, 709 So. 2d 144, 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (footnote omitted). The issue has also been brought into focus by Judge Altenbernd at the Second District: From reviewing many sentencing transcripts, it is clear to me that trial judges use several different procedures to…
• Travis v. State, 724 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
  …led to jail credit on concurrent sentencing. This court had previously held that claims for credit which do not allege a sen [*121] tence which exceeds the statutory maximum were not cognizable under Rule 3.800(a), see, e.g., Vanderblomen v. State, 709 So. 2d 144, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D795 (Fla. 1st DCA March 24,1998). As noted, that holding was recently rejected by the Florida Supreme Court. Whenever the record reflects that jail credit was not properly awarded as mandated by section 921.161(1), the sentence i…
• Forrest Atwood v. State, 765 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
  …filed, may be treated alternatively as a claim for relief made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, so that the trial court can conduct such other proceedings as may be appropriate to determine the merits. See Vanderblomen v. State, 709 So. 2d 144, 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Hall v. State, 643 So. 2d 635, 636 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); McGowan v. State, 586 So. 2d 1311 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). We REVERSE the order summarily denying relief and REMAND, with instructions. ERVIN, LAWRENCE, and BROWNING, JJ…