BRENDA MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BRENDA MOORE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
709 So. 2d 204
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
REVERSED. See Meeker v. State, 584 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).
ERVIN, BOOTH and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Univ. Med. Clinics, Inc. v. Quality Health Plans, Inc., 51 So. 3d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)…thin a court’s discretion to run the injunction from the period of entry of the injunction rather than from termination of the agreement. See Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla., 183 So. 2d 532 (Fla.1966); Mut. Benefits Corp. v. Goldenberg, 709 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). In sum, we find there was sufficient evidence to affirm the trial court’s order for injunctive relief, but we remand for entry of an order delineating the required factual findings. We find the other issue involving the applica…
-
Anakarli Boutique, Inc. v. Nahomi Ortiz, 152 So. 3d 107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…specified in the agreement between the parties. See Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Bailey, 550 So. 2d 563, 565 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Kverne v. Rollins Protective Servs. Co., 515 So. 2d 1320, 1321-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Mut. Benefits Corp. v. Goldenberg, 709 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Capelouto v. Orkin Exterminating Co. of Fla., 183 So. 2d 532, 534 (1966). Such enforceability assumes that the trial court has found the “contractually specified restraint” not to be “overbroad, overlong, or otherwise not reason…
Authorities Cited
- Meeker v. State, 584 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)