MICHAEL DAVIS A/K/A ANTHONY LEE THOMAS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MICHAEL DAVIS A/K/A ANTHONY LEE THOMAS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
709 So. 2d 641
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.
Michael Davis appeals from his sentence as a violent career criminal for offenses occurring on January 22, 1996. In Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), this court held that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, which created violent career criminal sentencing, is unconstitutional as a violation of the single subject rule. Thus, based on Thompson, we reverse Davis’s violent career criminal sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time of Davis’s sentencing on May 7, 1996.
Reversed and remanded.
QUINCE and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Valdes v. State, 728 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…28 So. 2d 1181 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Williams v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D255, - So. 2d -, 1999 WL 17662 (Fla. 2d DCA Jan. 20, 1999); Heggs v. State, 718 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Pugh v. State, 717 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Davis v. State, 709 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Taylor v. State, 709 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Jones v. State, 709 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Morris v. State, 708 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).…1 / 2
-
State v. Davis, 753 So. 2d 1284 (Fla. 2000)…PER CURIAM. We have for review Davis v. State, 709 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), in which the Second District Court of Appeal reversed Michael Davis’s violent career criminal sentence1 based on its prior decision in [*1285] Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). The Davis Court’s decision is in…
-
Davis v. State, 779 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…PER CURIAM. Michael Davis, a/k/a Anthony Lee Thomas, appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court on September 9, 1998, after this court had reversed his original sentence. See Davis v. State, 709 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), affirmed, 753 So. 2d 1284 (Fla.2000). We affirm the new sentence. To avoid any confusion, we note that this court issued its mandate in the first appeal on May 19, 1998. The order we entered thereafter on the State’s untimely mot…
Authorities Cited
- Thompson v. State, 708 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)