ROYCE MONTREAL REED, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Contemporaneous Objection Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Royee Reed appeals his convictions and sentences for four counts of robbery with a deadly weapon and argues that the lower court erred in restricting his voir dire questioning regarding his defense. We note from the record, however, that Reed never interposed any contemporaneous objections to the excluded questions nor did he voice any objection to the exclusion of his questions prior to the impaneling of the jury. Consequently, he has not preserved this issue for appellate review. See Rollins v. State, 707 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); see also e.g., Franqui v. State, 699 So. 2d 1332, 1334 (Fla.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1337, 140 L.Ed.2d 499 (1998); Karp v. State, 698 So. 2d 577, 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Jones v. State, 582 So. 2d 110, 111 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Osman v. Mavis McKEE, 762 So. 2d 950 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…NESBITT, Senior Judge. In McKee v. Osman, 710 So. 2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)(McKee I), we summarized the facts before us at .that time as follows: In the probate court below, a status conference was held during which the judge made an oral order. The oral order was not reduced to writing and no transcript…
Authorities Cited
- Franqui v. State, 699 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 1997)
- Marlin Mason Karp v. State, 698 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- Rollins v. State, 707 So. 2d 823 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Isom v. State, 582 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
- Jones v. State, 582 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)