JASON MARVIN WATSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Departure Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
KAHN, Judge.
Appellant Watson pled guilty to two counts of burglary. A sentencing guideline score-sheet prepared for Watson scored him at 30.4 points, thus establishing a guidelines sanction of other than a state prison sentence. § 921.0014(2), Fla. Stat. (1995). Nevertheless, the trial court noted two reasons for departure and sentenced appellant to twenty-four months in State prison. Although appellant now challenges the sentence, he neither objected to the departure, nor filed a motion under Rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The twenty-four month sentence is clearly not illegal. See Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193 (Fla.1995). Accordingly, the issue has not been properly preserved for appeal by appellant’s court-appointed counsel. See Middleton v. State, 689 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
AFFIRMED.
MINER and ALLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Env't Servs., Inc. v. Carter, 9 So. 3d 1258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009)…nner authorized by section 71.011, Florida Statutes (2008), the failure to do so is not fatal to ESI’s attempt to enforce the agreement against Lejeune, provided that the trial court is satisfied as to its essential terms. O’Donovan v. Citibank FSB, 710 So. 2d 654, 655 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Gutierrez v. Bermudez, 540 So. 2d 888, 891 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). [*1268] On remand, if the essential terms of the written agreement are established to the satisfaction of the trial court, it should be enforced against LeJeune…
-
State St. Bank & Tr. Co. for Holders of Bear Stearns Mortg. Sec. Inc. Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates v. Hartley Lord, 851 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…es possession either by the assignor at the time of loss or by the person seeking to enforce the note. Any remedy must, therefore, be left to the legislature. GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur. . We recognize that in O'Donovan v. Citibank, F.S.B., 710 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), the court affirmed a summary judgment allowing foreclosure but reversed on the re-establishment claim where there was a question of fact as to whether the plaintiff could re-establish the terms of the promissory note under sectio…
-
Deakter v. Augusto Menendez, Jr., 830 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…of fact is entitled to judge the witness’s credibility in its entirety and accept or reject the witness’s testimony on those and other issues as well.”), quoted in Hanono v. Murphy, 723 So. 2d 892, 893-894 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); O’Donovan v. Citibank, 710 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“Whether the ... proffered proof of the note’s essential terms was adequate for its reestablishment is a matter for determination by the trier of fact and should not be decided as a matter of law.”). II. ISSUES OF LAW The trial…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Davis v. State, 661 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 1995)
- Arlecia Michelle Middleton v. State, 689 So. 2d 304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)