JOSEPH HENRY DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Neil Objection cases and more on FLexlaw
[*724] PER CURIAM.
Of the appellant’s claims of trial error, his contention that a state peremptory challenge was improperly permitted over a Neil objection, although well taken, was not properly preserved, Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174 (Fla.1993); Bauta v. State, 698 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), review granted, 705 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1998); Karp v. State, 698 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and the other two present no reversible error. Hence, the convictions for first degree murder and armed burglary with a firearm on review are affirmed.
As the state acknowledges, however, the sentences must be corrected after remand to provide that the mandatory minimum terms for the use of a firearm in the two crimes must be made concurrent rather than consecutive because they occurred during a single criminal episode. State v. Christian, 692 So. 2d 889 (Fla.1997). In addition, the separate conviction and sentence for the possession of a firearm during the course of the armed burglary are vacated on the authority of Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1991).
Affirmed as modified.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carratelli v. State, 961 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 2007)…da defendant filed a petition for habe-as corpus in federal court alleging that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to renew (and thus preserve) an objection to the State’s peremptory challenge. Davis, 341 F. 3d at 1312-13; see Davis v. State, 710 So. 2d 723, 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (finding that the objection was not preserved); Davis v. State, 763 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (affirming the summary denial of Davis’s postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to preser…
-
Carratelli v. State, 915 So. 2d 1256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…rom the judge.” Jenkins, 824 So. 2d at 983. Carratelli relies upon Davis v. Secretary for Department of Corrections, 341 F. 3d 1310 (11th Cir.2003). There a state peremptory challenge was improperly permitted over a Neil objection. Davis v. State, 710 So. 2d 723, 724 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). [*1262] However, the defense objection was not properly preserved, because defense counsel did not renew his objections before the swearing in of the jury. Davis, 341 F. 3d at 1312 n. 3; see Joiner, 618 So. 2d at 174. Due to…
-
Davis v. State, 905 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…the defendant’s argument was well taken, the issue was not properly preserved for appeal as the defendant had failed to renew his objection prior to the jury being seated as required by Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174 (Fla.1993). See Davis v. State, 710 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). The defendant next filed, in the trial court, a pro se motion for post conviction relief under Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. This court affirmed the trial court’s denial of that motion. See Davis v. State, 763 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 2…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Joiner v. State, 618 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 1993)
- Quinten L. Cleveland v. State, 587 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1991)
- State v. Christian, 692 So. 2d 889 (Fla. 1997)
- Bauta v. State, 698 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
- Marlin Mason Karp v. State, 698 So. 2d 577 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)