ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT VANHOUTEN AND BRENDA VANHOUTEN, APPELLEES
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
ROBERT VANHOUTEN AND BRENDA VANHOUTEN, APPELLEES
710 So. 2d 727
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant complains that the trial court erred in sua sponte requiring the jury to reconsider the appellees’ damages on the ground that the verdict was inconsistent. Based on Allstate Insurance Co. v. Manasse, 707 So. 2d 1110 (Fla.1998), the appellees concede error. We therefore reverse and remand for entry of a judgment in accordance with the initial verdict in this case.
WARNER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hanson v. Hanson, 217 So. 3d 1165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…ribution of marital assets”); Matajek v. Skowronska, 927 So. 2d 981, 988 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (“[A]n award of attorney’s fees is inappropriate if the parties are left in relatively equal financial circumstances after the dissolution.”); Reed v. Reed, 710 So. 2d 727, 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“Where the equitable [*1169] distribution of the parties’ marital assets leave the parties in substantial financial parity, an award assessing attorney’s fees is an abuse of discretion.”). Further, the trial court cannot tu…
Authorities Cited
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Myrda Manasse, 707 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1998)