DANIEL POTTER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DANIEL POTTER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
710 So. 2d 754
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The state acknowledges that the written adjudication erroneously reflects that Appellant was found guilty as to count I. The trial court, recognizing that it could not sentence Appellant on both count I and count II, orally adjudicated him guilty only with regard to counts II, III, and IV. We recognize that the court did not sentence Appellant as to count I; nevertheless, we reverse and remand so that the trial court may vacate the adjudication as to count I. In all other respects, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
STONE, C.J., and FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Miami v. Hervis, 65 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…08-09 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (remanding for a new trial where court reporter determined that the tape recordings of the children’s testimony were blank and D.G. was prejudiced by this omission in the record through no fault of his own); Peretz v. State, 710 So. 2d 754, 755 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (reversing and remanding for a new hearing where transcript of involuntary commitment hearing could not be produced due to technological failure of the recording equipment and the record could not be reconstructed). B. The…