BARBARA WHITLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
JUDITH CRAIG, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Barbara Whitley, as guardian of an incapacitated ward Eleanor Aiello, petitioned to revoke a will executed by the ward before adjudication of incapacity, alleging undue influence and exploitation by the primary beneficiary Judith Craig. The court affirmed the trial court's denial, holding that Florida guardianship law does not authorize a guardian to revoke a ward's pre-incapacity will.
A guardian has no authority to revoke a will executed by a ward prior to the ward's incapacity. Florida Guardianship Law, Chapter 744, makes no provision for such an action by the guardian.
[1] A guardian cannot revoke a ward's will that was executed prior to the ward's adjudication of incapacity.
[2] Florida's Guardianship Law does not authorize a guardian to revoke a ward's will.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“a will executed by a ward prior to the ward's incapacity cannot later be revoked by the ward's guardian”
Establishes the core holding that guardians lack statutory authority to revoke pre-incapacity wills
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEleanor Aiello was adjudicated incapacitated on April 11, 1996. Prior to that adjudication, Judith Craig allegedly befriended Aiello over six years, i…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Guardianship Law cases and more on FLexlaw
PETERSON, Judge.
Barbara Whitley and Rita Aiello, as co-Guardians of the Person and Property of Eleanor Aiello, petitioned the circuit court for authorization to revoke the last will and testament of their ward, Eleanor Aiello, who was adjudicated incapacitated on April 11, 1996. The petitioners alleged that over a period of six years prior to the order of incapacity, Judith Craig befriended the ward, isolated her from friends and family, administered drugs to her to confuse her, exploited her, converted her assets, and persuaded her to execute a will naming Craig as the primary beneficiary. The trial court denied the petition to revoke the will, concluding that a will executed by a ward prior to the ward’s incapacity cannot later be revoked by the ward’s guardian.
We agree with the trial court and affirm. The Florida Guardianship Law, Chapter 744, Florida Statutes (1995), makes no provision for such an act by the guardian. See also Ullman v. Garcia, 645 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (guardian has no authority to contest validity of revocable trust that was executed prior to an adjudication of incompetency); In re Guardianship of Sherry, 668 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (guardian could not create new trust of ward’s assets under which remainder would go to different beneficiaries than those designated in ward’s will which was created before she was adjudicated incapacitated; doing so was tantamount to amending ward’s will, which was permitted under § 744.441 only in limited circumstances that did not apply).
The appellant, Barbara Whitley, alleges that her ward is adamant about revoking her existing will. We do not know if any specific rights were retained for the ward in the instant case, because the order appointing guardian was missing from the circuit court file at the time the record was forwarded to us. The Letters of Guardianship in the record do not indicate that any rights were preserved for the ward. In any event, Florida’s guardianship law does have the flexibility of providing for the restoration of some, if not all, of a ward’s rights if a sufficient degree of competency can be re-established. § 744.464, Fla. Stat. (1997).
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moossun v. Orlando Reg'l Health Care, 826 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 2002)…itionally, there are multiple decisions from Florida district courts of appeal which allow actions to proceed when considerably less record activity has occurred than that which was involved in the instant case. In DeVane v. P.J. Constructors, Inc., 710 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), the district court held that while the plaintiff had not taken any cognizable action since filing its complaint, the defendant’s amended answer constituted record activity sufficient to defeat a motion to dismiss for failure to…
-
Watsson Herbert Torrejon v. Martin, 882 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…Cruise Lines, Inc., 727 So. 2d 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Simmons v. Dakal Dev. Corp., 632 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). Further, “[a] plaintiff can rely upon a defendant’s activities to constitute record activity.” DeVane v. P.J. Constructors, Inc., 710 So. 2d 1375, 1377 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order dismissing the action for lack of prosecution. Reversed.…
Authorities Cited
- Ullman v. Garcia, 645 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
- In re the Guardianship OF Ruth Sherry. Harold Sherry v. Klevansky, 668 So. 2d 659 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)