THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
VANCE STRINGER, APPELLEE
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
VANCE STRINGER, APPELLEE
711 So. 2d 1390
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We reverse based on the authority of State v. Alvarez, 709 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), and remand with instructions to allow the defendant to either withdraw his plea and proceed to trial or be resentenced within the sentencing guidelines.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Yanick Charles v. Biscayne Builders, Inc., 719 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…PER CURIAM. Based on the authority of Litwinski v. Weitzer Country Homes, Inc., 711 So. 2d 1390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), we reverse the trial court’s orders vacating the extension of time for service of process and dismissing the plaintiffs’ ease for failure to timely effectuate service of process. We find that the plaintiffs asserted reasonable gr…
-
Nadir and Nafisa Khambaty v. Lepine, 734 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)…xtension before the time to effectuate service has expired and when a party moves for an extension after the time to effectuate service has expired. The distinction is best explained by the Third District in Litwinski v. Weitzer Country Homes, Inc., 711 So. 2d 1390, 1391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998): Contrary to appellees’ position, appellants were not required to show “good cause” for the extension of time because appellants moved for the extension prior to the expiration of the 120-day period. When a litigant seeks a…
Authorities Cited
- Mullins v. State, 709 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)