ANNIE CROSS, PETITIONER FOR HER HUSBAND, JAMES G. CROSS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
JOHN M. ADAMS, AS SHERIFF OF NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
ANNIE CROSS, PETITIONER FOR HER HUSBAND, JAMES G. CROSS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
JOHN M. ADAMS, AS SHERIFF OF NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
87 Fla. 416
Florida Supreme Court (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*417] Per Curiam.
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J;, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jacquelyn Hennagan v. Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles, 467 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…idden by, the employer, or was not necessary or appropriate to serve the interests of the employer, unless the wrongful act of the employee was done to accomplish his own purposes, and not to serve the interests of the employer. Stinson v. Prevatt, [87 Fla. 416] 94 So. 656 at 657 (Fla.1922). ... However, an employee is not acting in the scope of employment if it can be found that the employee has “stepped away” from employer’s business at the time of the infliction of the tort and that the motive was unre…