JOSE HARVEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1998-06-26
No. 97-00868
PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.
712 So. 2d 796 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

It is improper to sentence a defendant as a habitual offender upon violation of community control if they were not originally sentenced as such for the underlying offense.


Facts & Procedural History

Jose Harvey pleaded no contest to possession of cocaine and was not initially sentenced as a habitual offender. He later violated community control af…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
WHATLEY, Judge.

WHATLEY, Judge.

Jose Harvey appeals the habitual offender sentence he received in case number 91-541 for his violation of community control. We agree that the sentence is improper and reverse.

In 1991, Harvey pleaded no contest to possession of cocaine and was sentenced to 364 days in jail and 2 years of probation. The trial court did not sentence Harvey as a habitual offender at this time. Thereafter, Harvey violated his probation when he committed a burglary. He pleaded no contest to the burglary and violating his probation. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent terms of two years of community control in both cases. In addition, the court sentenced Harvey as a habitual offender for the burglary.

Harvey then violated community control, and after admitting the violation, he was sentenced as a habitual offender to concurrent ten-year prison sentences for both the possession charge and the burglary charge. Harvey contends, and the State concedes, that it was improper to sentence him as a habitual offender upon his violation of community control when he was not sentenced as a habitual offender on the original offense. See King v. State, 681 So. 2d 1136 (Fla.1996) (holding that it is improper to sentence a defendant as a habitual offender upon revocation of probation, where the defendant was not originally sentenced as a habitual offender).

Accordingly, we reverse Harvey’s habitual offender sentence for possession of cocaine and remand this case for the trial court to impose a sentence pursuant to the guidelines.

PARKER, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw