VALENCIA CAFE, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1998-07-15
No. 97-2588
Before NESBITT, LEVY and SHEVIN, JJ.
712 So. 2d 846 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1998) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 120.569(2)(d), Fla. Stat. (Supp. 1996); Santos v. 47 Service Station, Inc., 613 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Roman v. State, 786 So. 2d 1220 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …verette v. State, 736 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Under this test, the informant’s reliability and basis of knowledge are merely “relevant considerations.” Gates, 462 U.S. at 238-39, 103 S.Ct. 2317; Butler, 655 So. 2d at 1128. In Gayle v. State, 712 So. 2d 846 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), this court applied the Butler test and affirmed a trial court’s order denying a defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained through the use of a confidential informant. The court determined that, “the record establishes the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw