W. H. KENDRICK AND G. N. BENJAMIN, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
JOHN A. HENDERSON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
W. H. KENDRICK AND G. N. BENJAMIN, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
JOHN A. HENDERSON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
87 Fla. 476
Florida Supreme Court (1924)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 100 So. 794
Cited by 18 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The judgment herein is affirmed subject to the decree this day rendered in the case of Henderson v. Henderson et al.
It is so ordered.
Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Khalil Burshan, M.D. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. OF Pittsburgh, 805 So. 2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…e Coe v. Finlayson, 41 Fla. 169, 26 So. 704, 707 (1899). A later version of the statute of limitations, section 2939, Revised General Statutes of Florida, similarly employed the term “action upon a judgment.” See Van Deren v. Lory, 87 Fla. 422, 424, 100 So. 794, 795 (1924). Section 95.11(2)(a) now uses the term “action on a judgment.” Nothing in any subsequent revision of the statute of limitations indicates a legislative intent to change the meaning of the phrase by referring to an action “on a judgment”…
-
NEW York State Dep't OF Taxation v. Patafio, 829 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)….051 provides: (1) The running of the time under any statute of limitations except ss. 95.281, 95.35 and 95.36 is tolled by: (a) Absence from the state of the person to be sued. The seminal case for this holding is Van Deren v. Lory, 87 Fla. 422, 100 So. 794 (1924). More than seven years after Lory obtained a judgment, against Van Deren in Indiana (seven years was then the statute of limitations in Florida for suing on foreign judgments), Lory sued Van Deren in Florida on the judgment. In opposition to…
-
Salinas v. Ramsey, 234 So. 3d 569 (Fla. 2018)
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence