JORGE E. GONZALEZ, PETITIONER,
v.
HARRY K. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Jorge Gonzalez petitioned for belated appeals of a 1994 guilty plea conviction for kidnapping and battery, and an order denying his post-conviction relief motion under Rule 3.850. The court denied the belated appeal of the conviction but granted the belated appeal of the Rule 3.850 denial order, though affirmed the denial on the merits as time-barred.
The court denied the belated appeal of the conviction based on the express waiver of appellate rights at the plea colloquy. The court granted the belated appeal of the Rule 3.850 denial order because the trial court failed to advise Gonzalez of his appeal rights and deadline, but affirmed the denial on the merits because the motion was time-barred, as Gonzalez had ample time to file within the two-year deadline following disposition of his earlier Rule 3.800 appeal.
[1] A defendant who expressly waives the right to appeal at a guilty plea colloquy cannot seek a belated appeal absent specific exceptions outlined in Robinson v. …
[2] A belated appeal from an order denying post-conviction relief will be granted when the order fails to advise the defendant of the right to appeal and the deadline for doi…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[A] careful review of the record reveals that the defendant pled guilty, that at the plea colloquy, the defendant expressly waived his right to a direct appeal, and that the defendant's motion failed to allege with specificity any of the limited exceptions, dictated by Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979), necessary for an appeal from a guilty plea.”
Establishes the standard for appeal from guilty plea—an express waiver at colloquy precludes appeal unless limited exceptions are alleged.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceGonzalez entered a guilty plea in 1994 to charges of kidnapping and battery, expressly waiving his right to a direct appeal at the plea colloquy. He l…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion cases and more on FLexlaw
COPE, Judge.
Jorge E. Gonzalez petitions for a belated appeal of two orders. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(j). We grant relief in part and deny relief in part.
First, defendant-petitioner Gonzalez petitions for a belated appeal of the judgment entered against him on his guilty plea to the charges of kidnapping and battery. The plea was entered into in 1994.1 Defendant contends that, even though he waived the right to appeal, he nonetheless requested that his trial counsel take an appeal.
We deny the belated appeal on authority of Gonzalez v. State, 685 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), and Loadholt v. State, 683 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). “[A] careful review of the record reveals that the defendant pled guilty, that at the plea colloquy, the defendant expressly waived his right to a direct appeal, and that the defendant’s motion failed to allege with specificity any of the limited exceptions, dictated by Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979), necessary for an appeal from a guilty plea.” Gonzalez, 685 So. 2d at 976 (citations omitted); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)-(B); cf. Harriel v. State, 710 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (en banc) (evaluating limited right to appeal from a plea of guilty or nolo contende-re).
We certify direct conflict with Trowell v. State, 706 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (en banc), review granted, (Fla. No. 92,393 March 5,1998); Faircloth v. State, 661 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Owens v. State, 643 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); and Gunn v. State, 612 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Defendant also petitions for a belated appeal of an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the order did not advise defendant of the right to appeal and the deadline for doing so, we grant the belated appeal. See Viqueira v. Roth, 591 So. 2d 1147, 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992).
On the merits, however, we concur with the trial court that the motion was time-barred.
Defendant argues that he could not file his Rule 3.850 motion until disposition of an earlier filed appeal from denial of his Rule 3.800 motion. For present purposes we assume that one or more of the Rule 3.800 issues was repeated in the Rule 3.850 motion, such that the trial court could not rule on the 3.850 motion until the pending Rule 3.800 appeal had been disposed of. See Montague v. State, 710 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Bates v. State, 704 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997); Kimmel v. State, 629 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). In this ease, the defendant’s earlier Rule 3.800 appeal was disposed of eleven months before the expiration of the two-year deadline for filing a Rule 3.850 motion.
Accordingly, the defendant had ample time and there was no legally sufficient excuse for failure to file timely. The order denying posteonvietipn relief is affirmed.
Petition for a belated appeal' granted in part and denied in part; order denying post-conviction relief affirmed; direct conflict certified.
. Under Rule 9.140(j) there is a two-year time limit for requesting a belated appeal. Id. R. 9.140(j)(3)(a). However, the two-year time limit began to run on the date of the adoption of this rule, which was effective January 1, 1997. See Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 696 So. 2d 1103, 1107 (Fla.1996). Consequently, the petition, filed February 7, 1998, is timely.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Walker v. State, 742 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)…Canty v. State, 730 So. 2d 385, 386 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Canton v. State, 729 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Ponce v. State, 722 So. 2d 838, 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Battie v. Singletary, 718 So. 2d 323, 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Gonzalez v. Singletary, 713 So. 2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA) review granted, 719 So. 2d 892 (Fla.1998); and White v. Singletary, 711 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). See Trowell, 739 So. 2d at 78.…
-
Ponce v. State, 722 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979), necessary for an appeal from a guilty plea.” Gonzalez v. State, 685 So. 2d 975, 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (citations omitted); see also Battie v. Singletary, 718 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Gonzalez v. Singletary, 713 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); White v. Singletary, 711 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Loadholt v. State, 683 So. 2d 596, 597 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Hampton v. State, 680 So. 2d 581, 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). We certify direct conflict with Trowell v. State, 706 So…
-
Gonzalez v. Singletary, 749 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 1999)…PARIENTE, J. We have for review the decision in Gonzalez v. Singletary, 713 So. 2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), which the district court certified to be in conflict with the opinions in Trowell v. State, 706 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), Faircloth v. State, 661 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), Owens v. State, 643 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 1st DCA…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited (15 total)
- Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 685 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1996)
- Dameion Harriel v. State, 710 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)
- Bates v. State, 704 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- Trowell v. State, 706 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)
- Viqueira v. Roth, 591 So. 2d 1147 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
- Gunn v. State, 612 So. 2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- Kimmel v. State, 629 So. 2d 1110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
- Gonzalez v. State, 685 So. 2d 975 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)