PAUL BOROWSKI, APPELLANT,
v.
KIMMINS CONTRACTING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
PAUL BOROWSKI, APPELLANT,
KIMMINS CONTRACTING CORPORATION, APPELLEE
713 So. 2d 1068
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1998)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Paul Borowski appeals an order granting summary judgment in favor of Kimmins Contracting Corporation. Borowski’s cause of action is for nuisance related to a construction project. We reverse because genuine issues of material fact remain which preclude the entry of summary judgment. See Tamm v. Bradley, 696 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Reversed and remanded for reinstatement of Borowski’s complaint.
PATTERSON, A.C. J., and ALTENBERND and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Barco v. State, 324 So. 3d 606 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)…0(b); Huff v. State, 569 So. 2d 1247, 1250 (Fla. 1990). Here, Mr. Barco did not appeal his judgment and sentence. Thus, the judgment and sentence became final thirty days from the date the judgment and sentence were rendered. See Radford v. State, 713 So. 2d 1068, 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ("[F]inality of the judgment and sentence, however, does not occur until the expiration of the thirty days allowed criminal defendants to file a notice of appeal therefrom."). The postconviction court found that Mr. Barco "[…
-
Evans v. Rozas (M.D. Fla. 2024)…ected to STAY and ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case until Plaintiff's state criminal proceedings conclude. Not later than 30 DAYS after the state criminal proceedings conclude, .within 10 days after the rendition of the verdict. .); Radford v. State, 713 So. 2d 1068, 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (“[F]inality of the judgment and sentence, however, does not occur until the expiration of the thirty days allowed criminal defendants to file a notice of appeal therefrom."); Rule 9.140(b)(3), Fla.R.App.P. (“The defendant m…
Authorities Cited
- Tamm v. Bradley, 696 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997)