JOHN BASIL KEOUGH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes, is not unconstitutionally vague and does not deny due process.
[1] A statute is not unconstitutionally vague for failing to define "high speed" in the context of a vehicle pursuit.
[2] A statute is not unconstitutionally vague for stating that a defendant "causes" a law enforcement officer to engage in a high-speed pursuit.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceKeough fled from deputies at high speed, leading to a chase that ended when his tires were deflated and he crashed. He was convicted of aggravated fle…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Aggravated Fleeing And Eluding cases and more on FLexlaw
THOMPSON, Judge.
John Basil Keough appeals his conviction for aggravated fleeing and eluding. We affirm.
Keough was convicted of aggravated fleeing and eluding, which is proscribed by section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes:
(2) Any person who, in the course of unlawfully fleeing or attempting to elude a law enforcement officer in an authorized law enforcement patrol vehicle with agency insignia and other jurisdictional markings prominently displayed on the vehicle with siren and lights activated pursuant to subsection (1), having knowledge of an order to stop by a duly authorized law enforcement officer, causes the law enforcement officer to engage in a high-speed vehicle pursuit commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in Sec. 775.082, Sec. 775.083, or Sec. 775.084.
Keough contends that section 316.1935(2) is unconstitutionally vague because there is no definition of “high speed,” and because “causes the law enforcement officer to engage,” is not explained. In addition, he argues that the subsection denies due process because it assigns criminal liability to a defendant for the actions of a law enforcement officer. We disagree.
During an investigatory stop by deputies, Keough raced his Chevrolet Camaro out of the open gate of an otherwise enclosed water treatment plant compound, and fishtailed his way past one of the deputies, who testified that he would have been hit if he had not moved out of the way of Keough’s car. A chase ensued that involved speeds as high as 118 m.p.h., and which ended forty miles later after “stop sticks” deflated Keough’s tires, causing him to fail to negotiate a turn, hit a pole, and land in a river. Based on these facts, and on Travis v. State, 700 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), Fox v. State, 700 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), and State v. Barnes, 686 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), with which we agree, we hold that Keough has failed to show that section 316.1935(2) is constitutionally infirm.
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Munro v. State, 714 So. 2d 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…THOMPSON, Judge. We affirm the conviction for aggravated fleeing and eluding under section 316.1935(2), Florida Statutes (1995), because appellant has not shown that the statute is constitutionally infirm, see Keough v. State (Fla. 5th DCA 1998), 714 So. 2d 666, Travis v. State, 700 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), rev. denied, 707 So. 2d 1128 (Fla.1998), Fox v. State, 700 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 705 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1998), or that it bears no reasonable and substantial relation to the p…
-
King v. State, 718 So. 2d 380 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See, Keough v. State, 714 So. 2d 666 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Crawford v. State, 666 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Andrews v. State, 533 So. 2d 841 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988), rev. denied, 542 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 1989); Jackson v. State, 456 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Duke v. State, 444 So. 2…
Authorities Cited
- Kemrick Travis v. State, 700 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
- FOX v. State, 700 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)