ANTONIO D. JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Antonio Johnson appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 postconviction motion challenging his sentencing guidelines scoresheet. The court finds a patent computational error in how attempted kidnapping was scored and reverses, holding that attempted kidnapping must be scored one level below the completed offense under Florida Statutes § 777.04(4)(a).
The court holds that attempted kidnapping must be scored one level below completed kidnapping because attempted kidnapping is not specifically listed at a designated severity level in § 921.0012. Therefore, the plain language of § 777.04(4)(a) requires the one-level reduction, which would reduce Johnson's sentence from 90.2 months to 68.2 months.
[1] A criminal attempt is generally ranked one level below the severity ranking of the completed offense for sentencing purposes, unless specifically exempted by statute.
[2] The statutory exception to the reduced ranking of criminal attempts applies only to those attempted crimes that are assigned their own specific severity ranking.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Except as otherwise provided in ss. 828.125(2), 849.25(4), 893.135, and 921.0012, the offense of criminal attempt, criminal solicitation, or criminal conspiracy is ranked for purposes of sentencing under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944 one level below the ranking under s. 921.0012 or s. 921.0013 of the offense attempted, solicited, or conspired to.”
The statutory provision establishing the one-level reduction for attempted crimes, which forms the basis for Johnson's challenge.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJohnson pleaded no contest to attempted burglary and attempted kidnapping. He was sentenced to 90.2 months in the Department of Corrections based on a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Plain Language Statutory Construction cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Antonio D. Johnson challenges the trial court’s summary denial of his motion for postconvietion relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Johnson raises one claim which may have merit and is not refuted by the record attached to the trial court’s order. Johnson contends that his guidelines scoresheet contains a patent computational error which has resulted in an excessively long sentence of imprisonment. We reverse as to this issue, but affirm the order in all other respects.
Johnson pleaded no contest to attempted burglary and attempted kidnapping. He was sentenced to a guidelines sentence of 90.2 months’ incarceration in the Department of Corrections. Johnson asserts the primary offense on the guidelines scoresheet, his attempted kidnapping charge, should have been scored as a level 8 offense, not a level 9 offense. He argues that the language of section 777.04, Florida Statutes (1995), requires a criminal attempt to be ranked one level below the severity ranking of a completed offense.
The trial court denied relief, indicating that under sections 787.01(a)(2) and 921.0012(3), Florida Statutes (Supp.1996), the attempted kidnapping charge maintains its level 9 ranking, and was, therefore, properly scored as a level 9 offense.
In pertinent part, section 777.04 states: (4)(a) Except as otherwise provided in ss. 828.125(2), 849.25(4), 893.135, and 921.0012, the offense of criminal attempt, criminal solicitation, or criminal conspiracy is ranked for purposes of sentencing under chapter 921 and determining incentive gain-time eligibility under chapter 944 one level below the ranking under s. 921.0012 or s. 921.0013 of the offense attempted, solicited, or conspired to. If the criminal attempt, criminal solicitation, or criminal conspiracy is of an offense ranked in level 1 or 2 under s. 921.0012 or s. 921.0013, such offense is a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775. 082 or s. 775.083.
Sections 828.125(2), 849.25(4), and 893.135, Florida Statutes (1995), which are specifically exempted from the operation of section 777.04, list instances where a criminal attempt is denominated of equal severity as the completed crime. Section 921.0012, which designates the severity ranking of most felony offenses, reflects instances in which the attempt of a crime is specifically listed at a particular severity ranking. For example, attempted premeditated murder is specifically listed as a level 9 offense. Attempted kidnapping is not specifically listed at a designated level ranking under section 921.0012. We interpret the inclusion of section 921.0012, with the other exceptions listed in section 777.04, to remove from the reduced ranking of this provision only those attempted crimes which are assigned their own severity ranking.
In order to adhere to the plain language of section 777.04(4)(a), the guideline scoresheet should list the severity ranking of the charge of attempted kidnapping at one level below the severity ranking listed for the completed charge. This change in the severity ranking would potentially change Johnson’s sentence from 90.2 months’ incarceration to 68.2 months’ incarceration. Accordingly, we reverse the order denying Johnson’s motion for postconviction relief as to this issue and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings.
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and GREEN, JJ., concur.