ED MURPHY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
ED MURPHY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
108 Fla. 21
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 145 So. 837
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Davis, C. H., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
LEE Cnty. OIL Co., Inc. v. Marshall, 98 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1st DCA 1957)…f this Court that the judgment appealed from must be and the same is hereby reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. STURGIS, C. J., and O’CONNELL, STEPHEN C., A. J., concur. . E.g.: Terranova v. Stearns, 108 Fla. 21, 141 So. 597, 145 So. 256; Collins Ave. & Ocean Investment Co. v. Crawford, 114 Fla. 469, 154 So. 211; Southern Liquor Distributors, Inc. v. Kaiser, 150 Fla. 52, 7 Solid 600. . See: Mizner Land Corp. v. Abbott, 128 Fla. 489, 175 So. 507. . Hart v.…