GUILLERMO GONZALEZ, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Velasco, 855 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …e wife’s ability to proceed to the merits of the case. In this case, however, the former wife failed to request a transfer to the civil division and thus cannot raise this issue for the first time on appeal. See Labrada v. Metropolitan Dade County, 715 So. 2d 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).…
• Calero v. Metro. Dade Cnty., 787 So. 2d 911 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  ….28(6) did not sufficiently identify the County as the agency allegedly responsible for the plaintiffs' injuries. This court concluded that the letter was sufficiently specific and reversed that summary judgment. Labrada v. Metropolitan Dade County, 715 So. 2d 1126, 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998). . If we were to accept the wife's argument on this point, the wife in this case would be in a better position than the wife in Reyes itself. Ms. Reyes had her consortium claim dismissed on account of a lack of section 768.…

Authorities Cited

• Whitchard v. State, 459 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)